Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 7,398 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Two Foreign Keys? #25026
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    I think your initial post and the dump do not quite correspond. Table names are not the same! So i have a little trouble identifying exactly what the FK's should look like!

    But I think the two *VOL_id's and the two *IM_id's ??

    This

    KEY `LNKIM_id` (`LNKIM_id`,`LNKVOL_id`)

    will not work, I think. I think you will need a seperate key for every column like

    KEY `LNKIM_id` (`LNKIM_id`),

    KEY `LNKVOL_id` (`LNKVOL_id`),

    but even after that change I too can only create ONE (and any) of the FK's

    I am also wondering what I am missing ….

    in reply to: Two Foreign Keys? #25024
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    I think you should attach a structure-only dump of the tables involved.

    Are you sure that datatypes are matching? Trying to create a FK on string columns with different collations … lots of possbilities!

    in reply to: Link Query Tabs To Schema Drop-down #25013
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    no .. not wrong. There are always PROs and CONs with any GUI design.

    In terms of SQL implementation we would then have to send a USE statement when a specific Query tab is clicked. That could be done, and we could relatively easy implement some kind of a 'properties' dialogue for a Query tab.

    We should then optimally as well change the display of the selected database in

    * the dropdown where selected database displays

    * the Object Browser

    when a Query tab is clicked.

    If you noticed: when you select in OB the dropdown changes, but when you select in dropdown OB display does not (it is the dropdown that 'counts')! There are some coding difficulties here that have not been solved. If a Query tab should SIGNAL change-of-database to the other GUI elements then it get even more complicated. But of course complications is no excuse!

    I think we will need to discuss this! We will relase 6.1 beta 1 shortly and after that we can get some air for discussing new ideas.

    in reply to: Schema Browser Not Linked To Query Tabs #25017
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    good point!

    the 'parent' of the DATA tab is the Object Browser.

    the HISTORY tab is 'child' of every Query tab that has been opened since connection was established

    all other TABs have the selected Query TAB as 'parent'.

    Actually .. with hindsight .. it would be more logical if the DATA tab was the 1st/leftmost tab (as close to the Object Browser as possible) and if some graphics clearly indicated this parent/child structure!

    in reply to: Error 2013: Lost Connection To Mysql Server During Query #25023
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    If it is COMMUNITY version it is direct connection!

    if it is EXACTLY 20 minutes it looks like a time-out setting on the server/the remote network or some networking gear.

    if it is more RANDOM it simply may be the connection that is not very stable. Could you try from another location (home/office/a friend/whatever)

    in reply to: Link Query Tabs To Schema Drop-down #25011
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    I replied in your other topic!

    What some other program does does not matter if it is wrong!

    A query in MySQL (and therefore not a query tab either) is not restricted to access a single database!

    I think instead we should 'push' the request (by other users and me!) to rename a Query Tab. It could be an option that the query tab gets named from the selected database at the time of creation (like 'query.1stdatabase.1','query.1stdatabase.2','query.1stdatabase.3','query.2nddatabase.1' etc)

    If 'linking' means restricting access to other databases we won't!

    in reply to: Schema Browser Not Linked To Query Tabs #25015
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    A Query TAB can contain queries using more than ONE database (actually a single SELECT can).

    It is not possible to 'link' a specific Query TAB to a specific database in the Object Browser.

    I suggest you add a comment at the top like

    — must use some_database

    What you should understand is that the selected database is the latest one one specified with a USE statement.

    When you work on that database you won't need to use full syntax like `database`.`table` ; `table`alone will do.

    I do not see how this request can be implemented.

    in reply to: Error 2013: Lost Connection To Mysql Server During Query #25021
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    Basically if you want us to help with that you should upgrade to the latest stable version and verify if the problems persists.

    Whatever issue there might be, we can only possibly fix issues in FUTURE versions – not in PAST versions.

    But the connection type (direct, HTTP or SSH) would probably be relevant information to give!

    in reply to: Table Data Truncation #25019
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    confirmed!

    test case:

    CREATE TABLE `test` (

    `n` int(11) NOT NULL,

    `t` varchar(5000) default NULL,

    PRIMARY KEY (`n`)

    )

    INSERT INTO test (t) VALUES — t is a varchar(5000)

    ('aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbbcccccccccc'); — 500 a's 10 b's 10 c's

    select t from test;

    — in DATA TAB and RESULT TAB GRID mode only ONE 'c' is displayed

    — in RESULT TAB TEXT mode ALL 'c's are displayed

    Basically this is a MySQL 5.0 compability issues that we did not fix. Before version 5.0 MySQL varchars could be only 255 characters.

    We should provide an option for user to define the length of string (no matter the type) that should open in the BLOB viewer. For most users I think even a string 100 characters long is too long for the GRID.

    Actually it has been here:

    http://webyog.com/faq/content/33/20/en/pla…-of-sqlyog.html

    .. for long. Always was given 2nd priority!

    In the short term we should consider to raise the max witdh of the cell to around 65.600 (if it can be done with the GRID code) to support mySQL 5.0 LONG varchars

    in reply to: Bug Or Feature? Ssh Connection Tab. Password Always Needed #24984
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    Yes – the PLINK shipped with SQLyog is a special build.

    I do not understand either why “-P 22” is wrong when P defaults to 22?

    in reply to: Great Info, But Now What? #25005
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    We will provide an option to analyze the SLOW LOG from inside MONyog soon.

    With version 1.1 (beta1) we support SHOW FULL PROCESSLIST from inside MONyog and you can monitor the queries in real time, and EXPLAIN them.

    Please refer to the 1.1 beta1 release notes: http://www.webyog.com/forums//index.php?sh…view=getnewpost

    in reply to: Import Error 1148 #24776
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    If there is no “local-infile” in the MySQL configuration file it is by default enabled.

    MA did not realise that! And it did the opposite of what the GUI told!

    Besides I do not remember that old discussion in details any more.

    The '0' and '1' settings are explained here:

    http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/pri…es-options.html

    in reply to: Extra Whitespace In Csv Export #25003
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    bug confirmed! (latest interanl 5.1 build, MySQL 5.0.45)

    very easy to see if you disable 'word wrap' in the editor where you view it!

    and BTW: compliments for an excellent bug report!

    in reply to: Small Gui Suggestions To Sqlyog #25001
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    btw.. you were posting in the MONyog category. Moving the post to SQLyog category!

    in reply to: Small Gui Suggestions To Sqlyog #25000
    peterlaursen
    Participant

    your request added here:

    http://code.google.com/p/sqlyog/issues/detail?id=381

    http://code.google.com/p/sqlyog/issues/detail?id=382

    We should have 'select/deselect all' in ALL grids! We all agree!

    What are the parameters that you want structure sync to remember (note that if you have a gmail address you can add yourself to the issue tracker)

Viewing 15 posts - 3,691 through 3,705 (of 7,398 total)