Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
[email protected]Member
Cal,
I want to state … this is a good product and the developer(s) has done a GREAT job. Please don't think that I don't appreciate the hard work that went into this. 🙂 And like Cal, I also respect one's right to license his/her product any way s/he sees fit.
Quote:Do you use Windows? Why if it's not Open Source?It's funny that you actually mentioned Windows to me … if you knew me, you would laugh too. I cannot stand Windows … nor do I willingly use it. I only use it at work (30% of the time) or for programs that the creators haven't written for Linux ( I know of one 😛 ). If SQLyog were GPL, I could rewrite it for Linux and have another reason to not use Windows.
Quote:I will not refuse to use a product based solely on the concept that it is not OS. You use Windows, but it is not open source. Why hold SQLyog to a different standard simply because you did not have to pay for it?You are making assumptions again that I willingly use windows … I actually refuse to use windows whenever I can because it's not GPL. Licensing can change at any moment – and does. (not to mention all of it's nice little call home features 😉 ). I hold Windows to the exact same standard I hold SQLyog.
Quote:It is not true that user supplied patches insure stability. When a project is properly managed, open source or not, it will be stable. User supplied patches are just as likely to induce instability as closed source patches.I don't think this was directed at me because I never said anything about stability. My reference to patching had to deal with the time a consumer has to wait until the lone developer gets around to developing a patch.
-joe
[email protected]MemberThere are many advantages for a consumer if a product is licensed under the GPL. The main one for me being that if I want to change something … I can.
What happens if development of this product is discontinued? I'm not going to roll this out to my company if I have no guarantee that it's going to be around in the future. I think the GPL guarantees this – whether I continue development or somebody else. What about upgrades / bug fixes? We have to wait for the developers to fix them.
I have nothing against this product, I downloaded it and really like it … I'll use it at home without hesitation. The problem arises, though, that I have no guarantee this is going to be free in the future or will evolve to meet my needs so how can I roll this out to my company? Maybe home users are the target audience for webyog, I don't know.
Any information to help remove my reservations is welcomed.
Thanks,
-joe
[email protected]MemberWhy not GPL this baby? I'm not trying to be a pest, just wondering.
Thanks,
-joe
-
AuthorPosts