Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,527 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Upgrade 3.7 gives me errors now! #15818
    Ritesh
    Member

    I think its a problem with the new client library. I will double check it and let you know.

    in reply to: SSL problems #15795
    Ritesh
    Member

    We are working on the SSL problem and I will reply back soon.

    in reply to: Remote Database update #15864
    Ritesh
    Member
    JasonPotter wrote on Jun 2 2004, 04:43 PM:
    Hi Guys,

    just saw another post that stated sja can handle multiple keys.  Now just have to confirm it can handle a column being auto inc at one end and not at the other.

    Cheers

    Jason

    STRUCTURE and PRIMARY KEY has to be exactly same on both the source and target server.

    SJA correctly handles multiple keys provided that the order of the columns in the keys are the same.

    in reply to: Remote Database update #15863
    Ritesh
    Member
    JasonPotter wrote on Jun 2 2004, 12:13 PM:
    Thanks for the response.

    Though I thought sja will delete the enteries in the target if they are not in the source or is this a configurable feature? Hence when you do the first sync the target will become exactly like Source1 and then after the second sync the target will exactly be like Source2, hence wiping out the data entered into the target from the first sync.

    Also what would the issues be if any, if Source1 and Source2 tried to do their syncs at the same time. In my case Source1 and Source2 are not always connected to the net and initiate their on connections. I would prefer not to have to specify connect times as these Source db's will connect to the net via GPRS and I am not always going to have a signal. So if I have a signal and can make a net connection via gprs I want to do the sync straight away. So there is a chance of 2 sync's running at the same time.

    I look forward to your response on both points.

    Cheers

    Jason

    By default SJA will delete the extra rows that are present in target but not in source. Starting from SQLyog 3.7, you can configure the synchronization agent for not to delete extra rows in the target.

    in reply to: Remote Database update #15858
    Ritesh
    Member

    SJA is a perfect solution for you. You need to run two sync sessions.

    1st session:Make source1 the source and master the target.

    2nd session:Make source2 the source and master the target.

    Do send me your comments on the result.

    in reply to: utf8 ? #15894
    Ritesh
    Member

    This feature will be added in one of our next releases.

    Till then you can execute ALTER TABLE statement to set the character-set to utf8.

    in reply to: Upgrade 3.7 gives me errors now! #15816
    Ritesh
    Member

    The link is http://www.webyog.com/sqlyog/SQLyog364.exe and not http://www.webyog.com/sqlyog/SQLyog364.com

    Please download the binary and do tell me the result.

    in reply to: Remote Database update #15856
    Ritesh
    Member

    SQLyog uses PRIMARY KEY as the locus for determining changes in the data. If you need to merge data from two sources then you need to have unique primary key values across the databases.

    in reply to: Does SJA work with MSSQL? #15892
    Ritesh
    Member

    Sorry but SJA can only be used to sync data between two MySQL databases.

    in reply to: Remote Database update #15854
    Ritesh
    Member
    robmann wrote on May 28 2004, 03:21 PM:
    So can you sync the online data and the local data even though you are entering new data all the time both online and locally? I read something about if primary keys are the same the target gets overwritten? is there a way to sync if you have the same primary keys in each table?

    Yes 🙂 SJA is perfect for such situation.

    You require 2-way sync between the source and the target database. The only thing you need to keep in mind is that SJA will try to bring the target in sync with the source. In case of conflicting Primary Keys, the data from the source overwrites the target data.

    e.g. if you have the following condition:

    source:

    =========

    1 SQLyog

    2 Ritesh

    target:

    ========

    1 SQLyog Agent

    3 MySQL

    After you run the sync the source and target will become:

    source:

    ==========

    1 SQLyog

    2 Ritesh

    3 MySQL

    target:

    ==========

    1 SQLyog

    2 Ritesh

    3 MySQL

    Note: The above is only applicable if you perform 2-way sync.

    HTH

    in reply to: Synch problem on MySQL 4.0.17 #15893
    Ritesh
    Member

    I believe you are using SJA for Linux. As I can see, you are doing a 2-way sync. SJA should work in this situation.

    Can you send me a backup of the database so that I can run a sync at my place?

    in reply to: Importing OLE-Object Fields from Access to MySQL #15891
    Ritesh
    Member

    SQLyog is supposed to work properly with binary-data. Anyway, it will be nice if you can send me a backup of your database.

    in reply to: Variable colour (color) settings storable #15890
    Ritesh
    Member

    Thanks for your suggestion 🙂

    I have forwarded your request to my development team.

    in reply to: Export Database as Batch File? #15887
    Ritesh
    Member

    Check the option:

    “Set FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0” in Export As Batch Script dialog.

    in reply to: Error 1064 on synch procedure #15875
    Ritesh
    Member

    We are looking your issue. Give us some time 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 1,756 through 1,770 (of 2,527 total)