[aramando]

Ah, right, thanks. That does make sense.

Although I am happier about this way of operation now that I understand it, and can envisage scenarios where this could be useful, I still think it would be better if SQLyog always included the primary key in the underlying query when editing in the result window. I'm sure that wouldn't be too difficult for SQLyog to do, and it makes sense that when you are editing a single cell of the result table you can only change a single row's field.

[Author]

Posts