Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

Segmentation Fault With V5.2

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #23034
      peterlaursen
      Participant

      Not reproduceable here. Testing includes Fedora3, Fedora5, RHEL4 and SuSE10.

      I just tried passwords like '123()abc' and similar.

      We will need a complete test case or temporary access to your server.

      Create a ticket if you have some details you do not want to reveal here.

    • #23035
      Amir
      Member
      peterlaursen wrote on Dec 6 2006, 11:31 AM:
      Not reproduceable here. Testing includes Fedora3, Fedora5, RHEL4 and SuSE10.

      I just tried passwords like '123()abc' and similar.

      We will need a complete test case or temporary access to your server.

      Create a ticket if you have some details you do not want to reveal here.

      Unfortunatley the database servers are behind a firewall so I cant give you access. I'd be happy to run any testcase or anyting else you want me to run against the servers. I have root access to the server so can run any commands against the server.

      FWIW one server (src) is 4.0.20 and the other is 5.X (destination).

    • #23036
      Amir
      Member

      Thanks for the PM…

      So is there anything else at all I can do to find out whats wrong?, how can I make a “ticket”?.. Can I run the agent in debug mode to see what its not happy about?

      Tried to run the app under gdb, but it just sits there (and does nothing) ?

      Code:
      [amir@khan x7]$ gdb ./sja
      GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.5-13.fc6rh)
      Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
      GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
      welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
      Type “show copying” to see the conditions.
      There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type “show warranty” for details.
      This GDB was configured as “i386-redhat-linux-gnu”…(no debugging symbols found)
      Using host libthread_db library “/lib/libthread_db.so.1”.

      (gdb) run syncstage-newsql0.xml
      Starting program: /home/amir/tmp/x7/sja syncstage-newsql0.xml
      (no debugging symbols found)
      SQLyog Job Agent Version 5.2
      Copyright (c) Webyog Softworks Pvt. Ltd.. All Rights Reserved.

      Sync started at Wed Dec 6 13:05:09 2006

      Program received signal SIGTSTP, Stopped (user).
      0x08079acb in connect ()
      (gdb) quit
      The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y
      [amir@khan x7]$ date
      Wed Dec 6 13:05:48 GMT 2006
      [amir@khan x7]$

    • #23037
      peterlaursen
      Participant

      OK .. reproduced now.

      I can copy the text from your 'Code box' here and change the details and get the segmentation fault on Fedora3 and SuSE10. If I build a similar jobfile with the wizard on Windows and copy that file to Linux I do not.

      Password does not matter. It is reproducable with any password.

      We will have to look detailed into this tomorrow.

    • #23038
      Amir
      Member
      peterlaursen wrote on Dec 6 2006, 03:33 PM:
      OK .. reproduced now.

      I can copy the text from your 'Code box' here and change the details and get the segmentation fault on Fedora3 and SuSE10. If I build a similar jobfile with the wizard on Windows and copy that file to Linux I do not.

      Password does not matter. It is reproducable with any password.

      We will have to look detailed into this tomorrow.

      Thank you VERY much! 🙂

    • #23039
      peterlaursen
      Participant

      First observations is that if you add tags for each connection it will work. However omitting a tag should be OK, so this must be considered a bug.

      Enter the tags like:

      Code:





      localhost
      root **** 3306 [default]
      test2


      localhost
      root **** 3306 [default]
      test3


    • #23040
      Amir
      Member

      Added element and its working fine now.

      🙂

    • #23041
      peterlaursen
      Participant

      It should now (version 5.21) also work on LINUX without the tag.

      Can you confirm?

    • #23042
      Amir
      Member
      peterlaursen wrote on Dec 11 2006, 09:27 AM:
      It should now (version 5.21) also work on LINUX without the tag.

      Can you confirm?

      Works 🙂

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.