Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

Memory Corruption

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #9958
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Hi,

      i have 2 server

      A) local server [SO Suse 9.3 – Mysql 4.1.10a ]

      😎 remote server [SO Debian 3.1 – Mysql 5.0.24a]

      i'm using SQLyog Job Agent Version 5.18

      i need 2 kind of sync

      1) Item – one way sync – ok

      2) Order – two way sync – not ok

      this is the error… i have that error in two-wy sync and in one way sync…

      i have the error always in ordini_testa ( head of order ) and ordini_corpo ( body of order ) tables.

      Table SrcRows TgtRows Inserted Updated Deleted

      ========================= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======

      clienti 54668 54668 0 0 0

      clienti_rubrica 0 0 0 0 0

      note_ordini 30416 30416 0 0 0

      ordini_testa 42954 30013 *** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption: 0x08260620 ***

      Abortito

      can you help me to correct that error???

      my glibc is updated… 4.1.10a is the newest mysql package in suse repository…

      if i can solve that problem without recompile mysql i prefere… now i've only the package of the distribution…

      i made the MD5 test…

      on remote

      mysql> select md5(concat_ws('A','B',''));

      +


      +

      | md5(concat_ws('A','B','')) |

      +


      +

      | 5fc810cf62601df84b7923b9964c53e6 |

      +


      +

      1 row in set (0.00 sec)

      and on local too

      mysql> select md5(concat_ws('A','B',''));

      +


      +

      | md5(concat_ws('A','B','')) |

      +


      +

      | 5fc810cf62601df84b7923b9964c53e6 |

      +


      +

      1 row in set (0,00 sec)

      i've try to truncate the ordini_testa and ordini_corpo tables on local server… ( i try on a test DB, a duplicate of real DB )

      well if i try sync now i have no error

      Table SrcRows TgtRows Inserted Updated Deleted

      ========================= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======

      clienti 54668 54668 0 0 No change

      clienti 54668 54668 0 0 No change

      clienti_rubrica 0 0 0 0 0

      clienti_rubrica 0 0 0 0 0

      note_ordini 30416 30416 0 0 No change

      note_ordini 30416 30416 0 0 No change

      ordini_testa 42954 42954 0 0 No change

      ordini_testa 42954 42954 0 0 No change

      ordini_corpo 69097 69097 0 0 No change

      ordini_corpo 69097 69097 0 0 No change

      but if i add a new record on local table

      Table SrcRows TgtRows Inserted Updated Deleted

      ========================= ======= ======= ======== ======= =======

      clienti 54668 54668 0 0 No change

      clienti 54668 54668 0 0 No change

      clienti_rubrica 0 0 0 0 0

      clienti_rubrica 0 0 0 0 0

      note_ordini 30416 30416 0 0 No change

      note_ordini 30416 30416 0 0 No change

      ordini_testa 42955 42954 *** glibc detected *** malloc(): memory corruption: 0x08260620 ***

      Abortito

    • #22764
      adarsh
      Member

      hi

      we are not able to reproduce here so please provide

      above mentioned table create statement.

      Adarsh

      WebYog

    • #22765
      Anonymous
      Guest
      adi1 wrote on Oct 13 2006, 10:57 AM:
      hi

      we are not able to reproduce here so please provide

      above mentioned table create statement.

      i've attach a zip file with the schema and some few data

      and here i've put the xml shema for sync

      job version=”5.2″>

      syncjob>

      abortonerror abort=”yes” />

      fkcheck check=”no” />

      twowaysync twoway=”yes” />

      source>

      host>xxxxxx

      user>xxxxxx

      pwd>xxxxxx

      port>xxxx

      database>xxxxxx

      /source>

      target>

      host>xxxxxx

      user>xxxxxx

      pwd>xxxxxx

      port>xxxx

      database>xxxxxx

      /target>

      tables all=”no”>

      table>

      clienti

      /table>

      table>

      clienti_rubrica

      /table>

      table>

      note_ordini

      /table>

      table>

      ordini_testa

      /table>

      table>

      ordini_corpo

      /table>

      /tables>

      /syncjob>

      /job>

    • #22766
      adarsh
      Member

      bug is confirmed!

      we will fix this in next beta.

      thanks for reporting.

      bye

      Adarsh

      Webyog

    • #22767
      Anonymous
      Guest
      adi1 wrote on Oct 13 2006, 03:00 PM:
      bug is confirmed!

      we will fix this in next beta.

      thanks for reporting.

      bye

      Adarsh

      Webyog

      well… can you tell me when you think release next beta?

    • #22768
      Manoj
      Member

      Hello,

      The bug is fixed in the 5.2 Beta6 development tree.

      Expect a release on next Monday or Tuesday.

      Regards,

      Manoj

      Webyog

    • #22769
      Anonymous
      Guest
      Manoj wrote on Oct 13 2006, 03:31 PM:
      Hello,

      The bug is fixed in the 5.2 Beta6 development tree.

      Expect a release on next Monday or Tuesday.

      Regards,

      Manoj

      Webyog

      very good…

      i'm wait for next release

      regards

      Michele

    • #22770
      peterlaursen
      Participant
    • #22771
      adarsh
      Member

      hi

      today we released SQLyog 5.2 beta6 version you can download from this link.

      http://www.webyog.com/forums//index.php?showtopic=2507

      bye

      Adarsh

      Webyog

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.