Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

blob field slow, ferefence cannot be read

forums forums SQLyog SQLyog: Bugs / Feature Requests blob field slow, ferefence cannot be read

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #8469
      Yuri
      Member

      Dear mods,

      Here are some new experiences (using SQLyog 3.7.1 )

      – querying an innoDB table with 18 rows and 10 columns WITH BLOB FIELD takes one minute and 20 seconds, when hitting [enter] after selecting a table (way too long)

      – After creating a reference under “manage relationships” it cannot be edited. (well that's not that annoying), but also the reference cannot be fully read when the reference's display name is longer then 328px.

    • #15965
      CalEvans
      Member
      Quote:
      querying an innoDB table with 18 rows and 10 columns WITH BLOB FIELD  takes one minute and 20 seconds, when hitting [enter] after selecting a table (way too long)

      Ok this depends.

      Since we know MySQL is blindingly fast. And we know that SQLYog can keep up with MySQL then we have to look at external factors. (available bandwidth between client and server, size of rows being returned, number of rows being returned.)

      So in debugging your application (because this really isn't a bug in either MySQL or SQLYog, it's just your setup) I would suggest you look into the following questions.

      1: Is the server remote or local to you?

      2: How long does it take to return just 1 row?

      3: What's in the blob fields? (1k of text will return a whole lot faster than 1MB of MP3's.)

      4: Is it necessary for the application to have access to all 18 of the BLOB fields at once? If not, try filtering your query so that you only return 1 row.

      HTH,

      =C=

    • #15966
      Yuri
      Member

      Ok, the amount of data beïng transferred is the problem.. When i select a table i automatically hit the [enter] key for viewing the data, on big tables with blob-fields this results in a very long query time / crash. Wouldn't it be a great idea to let sqlyog exclude all the blob fields from the select query when hitting [enter] while still showing the column. Just when a blob-field is clicked the select query to that field can be executed.

      (or make this a option under preferences)

      And what about the references that cannot be read ?

      Thanks in advance…

    • #15967
      CalEvans
      Member
      Quote:
      Wouldn't it be a great idea to let sqlyog exclude all the blob fields from the select query when hitting [enter] while still showing the column. Just when a blob-field is clicked the select query to that field can be executed.

      Nope, it wouldn't. An option would be acceptable as long as it defaults to the current behavior.

      One wishlist item I'd like to see is a 'Select Statement for this table' like we have for Insert. This way I can delete the fields I don't want. (Because I have the exact same problem as you do in that respect.) Currently, I'll let SQLyog give me the Insert statement and then I strip out everything and use the field names for the select statement. On my larger tables, this beats typing them by hand.

      Don't know about the references. I'm not having that problem.

      =C=

    • #15968
      Shadow
      Member

      Editing foreign key are on my wishlist, but I think Ritesh mentioned this feature as one of the enhancements in SQLyog MAX.

    • #15969
      Yuri
      Member

      Why not add an “update statement for this table” also ?

      Quote:
      Don't know about the references. I'm not having that problem.

      Do you mean that the display size of the window i've added as screenshot in my first post differs from yours?

      Quote:
      but I think Ritesh mentioned this feature as one of the enhancements in SQLyog MAX.

      Thats nice, but i feel like it should be included in SQLyog also. (guessing that the upgrade to SQLyog MAX is not free).

    • #15970
      Shadow
      Member

      Ritesh said he would offer MAX at a discount price to current users.

    • #15971
      CalEvans
      Member
      Yuri wrote on Aug 30 2004, 01:29 PM:
      Quote:
      Don't know about the references. I'm not having that problem.

      Do you mean that the display size of the window i've added as screenshot in my first post differs from yours?

      No, I just don't use that editor to edit relationships. I'm old-school if I have to change a relationship, I do it by hand.

      =C=

    • #15972
      Shadow
      Member

      Actually, I don't use foreign key restrictions too much, I use application logic instead.

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.