Unsupported Screen Size: The viewport size is too small for the theme to render properly.

Segmentation Fault using SJA on Linux 9.0

forums forums SQLyog Sync tools, Migration, Scheduled Backup and Notifications Segmentation Fault using SJA on Linux 9.0

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 16 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #8695
      garybarnes
      Member

      I have been using SJA on other servers quite happily, but when I tried it on a server running Linux 9 I get a Segemtation Fault error. Typing sja on it's own returns the help prompt as normal, and when I try a script which is known to work on another machine the sja log and session files are created, but are empty (and I get the error). Any clues?

    • #16679
      Ritesh
      Member

      I have forwarded the issue to my development team.

    • #16680

      I have had the same problem.. just installed Fedora Core 3 (did all the updates)

      and setup sqlyog to sync to a database.

      I used the same xml file that I have on another server that already works…

      Figureing It may be somthing with the connectvity to the sql server.

      I tried to do it locally and received the same results.

      below is what I have in the xml File

      and the error..

      (Note I had to remove the beginning “<" to make it post. job version=”4..0″>

      syncjob>

      abortonerror abort=”no” />

      fkcheck check=”no” />

      twowaysync twoway=”no” />

      source>

      host>localhost

      user>root

      pwd />

      port>3306

      database>test

      /source>

      target>

      host>localhost

      user>root

      pwd>

      port>3306

      database>test2

      /target>

      tables all=”yes” />

      /syncjob>

      /job>

      SQLyog Job Agent Version 4.0

      Copyright © Webyog Softworks Pvt. Ltd.. All Rights Reserved.

      Sync started at Wed Dec 15 09:55:19 2004

      Segmentation fault

    • #16681
      Ritesh
      Member

      I think this issue is only related to Fedora Core :huh:

    • #16682

      I have it running fine on fedora core 2 and 1…

      just core 3 that is giving me problems..

    • #16683
      puzzlebox
      Member

      I've got the same problem, also on Fedora Core 3 – are there any workarounds available?

    • #16684
      Ritesh
      Member

      We are working on this issue. As of now there are no workarounds other then *not* using FC 3.

    • #16685
      dmakepeace
      Member

      Hi , has there been any fixes for this yet. I really need this to run on a Fedora Core 3 server. Thanks for any information.

    • #16686
      Ritesh
      Member

      We are actually working on the fix. You can expect a fix anywhere in the next week.

    • #16687

      it shows that their should be a fix in a couple weeks of feb 26th … I had not seen anything yet?

      Thanx

      Cris

    • #16688
      Ritesh
      Member

      I know we have been little late on this issue but currently we are extremely busy with v4.1 so this fix might take some time.

    • #16689
      ks32
      Member

      SQLyog Job Agent Version 4.0 gives Segmentation fault on Redhat 9 linux installation. Although it did work with sja-samples but if you modify them a little bit then it will give Segmentation fault error.

    • #16690
      JasonPotter
      Member

      Hi There,

      It has now been a couple of months since this error was raised, is there a fix?

      Regards

      Jason

    • #16691
      Ritesh
      Member

      No.

      We are still working on the issue.

    • #16692
      Ritesh
      Member

      We have released a new version of SJA for Linux that fixes the above segmentation fault bug.

      You can download it from http://www.webyog.com/sqlyog/downsja.html

      Waiting for your comments.

    • #16693
      Anonymous
      Guest

      i've the latest version of SJA Job Agent (4.0) but i have a segmentation fault when i start my sync….

      i think that the problem is Linux Red Hat 9…

    • #16694
      Ritesh
      Member

      When did you download it?

      We had released a new build on 31st May that fixed the above bug.

Viewing 16 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.